Dismissed

Sri. B H Channe Gowda v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC8 Feb 2024WP/828/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought inclusion in the voter list for a cooperative society election filed under the Writ jurisdiction. The petitioners requested the right to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an election dispute later. The court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to raise an election dispute under law; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Sri. B H Channe Gowda Vs the State of Karnataka — Company and Corporate | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:5512 WP No. 828 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 8^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 828 OF 2024 (CS-EL/M)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. B H CHANNE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, S/O LATE HANUMANNA,

¶9

SRI B K KRISHANMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA,

¶10

SRI B K MAHESH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA,

¶11

SRI.P.RAMESH AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O LATE PATALLAPPA,

¶12

Digitally signed by BELUR RANGADHAMA NANDINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

SRI VENKATESH AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O LATE PATALLAPPA,

¶14

SMT.M.MANJULA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O RAMESH,

¶15

SMT SOWBHAGYA S, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, W/O PRAKASH, ALL THE PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 7 ARE RESIDING AT MANDIBYADARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-561203, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

¶16

…PETITIONERS

¶17

(BY SRI BHADRINATH R, ADVOCATE)

¶18

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:5512 WP No. 828 of 2024

¶19

AND:

¶20

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATON, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶21

THE STATE CO-OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3^RD FLOOR, SHANTINAGAR TTMC, 'A' BLOCK, KENGAL HANUMANTHAIAH ROAD, SHANTI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶22

THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562110.

¶23

THE RETURNING OFFICER, MANDIBYADARAHALLI VILLAGE MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., MANDIBYADARAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-561203 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.

¶24

THE MANDI BYADARAHALLI MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., MANDIBYADARAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, DODDABALLAPURA TALUK-561203, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER.

¶25

…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SIDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR R1, R3 & R4 SRI T L KIRAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2, SRI DEVI PRASAD SHETTY, ADV. FOR R5)

¶26

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) DIRECT THE R3 TO 5 TO INCLUDE THE NAMES OF THE

¶27

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:5512 WP No. 828 of 2024

¶28

PETITIONERS IN THE FINAL ELIGIBLE VOTER LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CAST VOTE IN THE UPCOMING ELECTIONS TO R5 SOCIETY WHICH IS SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 21/01/2024 AS FOUND AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.

¶29

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶30

ORDER

¶31

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty of

¶32

the Court to withdraw the petition with a liberty to raise an election dispute.

¶33

Submission is placed on record.

¶34

Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Liberty is reserved to the petitioners to raise an

¶36

election dispute as provided under the law. If such a dispute is raised, same shall be considered in accordance with law without being influenced by this order of withdrawal of the petition.

¶37

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 40

¶38

Sd/JUDGE

¶39

CHS

Sri. B H Channe Gowda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri. B H Channe Gowda v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Fanuc India Private Limited Vs M/S Evergreen Machine Tool and Automation Pvt. Ltd.

American Express Banking Corp Vs Official Liquidator of Acropetal Technologies Limited (in Liqn)

Official Liquidator of M/S Magnum Integrafiks Pvt. Ltd. (in Liqn)., Vs Gm Communication

B Lingegowda Vs the Election Commissioner of Co-Operative Election Authority

Sri.B.Ashwathnarayana @ B. Ashwathnarayan Gowda Vs the State of Karnataka

T Sheshamma Vs the State of Karnataka