Writ petition challenging a chit fund dispute order and appellate order was dismissed as abated after counsel reported the petitioner had expired during the Covid period and no legal representatives were brought on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:2585 WP No. 81704 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 81704 OF 2013 (GM-CFA)
BETWEEN:
SMT. H.SOUBHAGYAMMA W/O H RAJGOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O: H.NO.2A, SEETARAM NIVAS, K.C.ROAD, BELLARY.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJA HIREMATH ., ADVOCATE)
AND:
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN UPPAR, AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; R-4 AND R-5 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TOQUASH THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED:21.08.2009 IN DISPUTE NO.52/2008-09/494 PASSED BY THE LEARNED DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHIT FUNDS AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BELLARY VIDE ANNEXURE-B AS THE SAME WAS PASSED IN VIOLATION OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND AGAINST THE PROVISION OF LAW AND ALSO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED:10.12.2012 PASSED IN APPEAL NO.3/2011-12 BY THE RESPONDENT No.1, VIDE ANNEXURE-D, ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
PRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0
Smt. H. Soubhagyamma
The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies Gulbarga Division, Raichur
The Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies and Chitfund Bellary District, Bellary
M/s Model Chit Corp (Karnataka) Ltd.
Sri. H Ram Prakash Reddy
Sri. H Ravi Prakash Reddy
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
