Petitioners challenged tender notifications for contract workers. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous due to efflux of time, noting the tender duration had expired and the result was previously made subject to the pending petition. No petitioner appeared.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12884 WP No. 81641 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.81641 OF 2013 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12884 WP No. 81641 of 2013
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION QUASHING THE QUOTATION NOTIFICATION NOKWB/EE(M)-DWD/TEC/AE-2/2013-14/458 AND NO.KWB/EE(M)DWD/TEC/AE-1/2013-14/457 DATED 07/06/2013, ISSUED BY RESPONDENTS IN DAILY KANNADA NEWS PAPERS VIJAYWANI AND A CORRIGENDUM 2 IN THE SAME PAPER DATED 16/07/2013 AT ANNEXURES-E AND F AND ETC.,
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12884 WP No. 81641 of 2013
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Challenging tender notification dated 07.06.2013 and corrigendum dated 16.07.2017 issued there to at AnnexureE and F, this writ petition is filed.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12884 WP No. 81641 of 2013
In view of above writ petition is dismissed as
infructuous due to efflux of time.
Sd/(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE
EM CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the tender notification is infructuous due to efflux of time.
Whether the trial tribunal proceeding is relevant to the validity of the contract workers' engagement notification.
Whether the petitioners are represented by counsel at the time of disposal.
Manjunath S/o. Rudrgouda Patil
Rudraya S/o. Karbasaoya Hiremath
Ningappa S/o. Mahantappa Hunkunti
Shivanand S/o. Channabasaya Hiremath
Fakirappa @ Prakash S/o. Ramappa Totger
Prashant S/o. Shivappa Betageri
Ravi V. Hosmani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
