The High Court dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution where the petitioner failed to appear despite court notice, noting the matter had been pending since 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12963 WP No. 80575 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V.HOSMANI
WRIT PETITION NO.80575 OF 2013 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
ANITA PATIL D/O. VEERANAGOUDA PATIL, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: COMPUTER TEACHR, R/O: NO. 421/D 4TH CROSS, VIDYANAGAR, BAILHONGAL, DIST: BELAGAVI.
…PETITIONER
(SMT.ANITA PATIL D/O VEERANGOUDA PATIL FOR PETITIONER)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12963 WP No. 80575 of 2013
INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, AN ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, NO. 179, 3RD FLOOR, I MAIN ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE – 560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI P.N.HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4, R7; SRI SUNIL S.DESAI, ADVOCATE FOR R5; NOTICE TO R6 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH, THE IMPUGNED PROVISIONAL SELECTION LIST PREPAID AND PUBLISHED FOR THE POST OF PRINCIPAL/LANGUAGE TEACHERS/ SUBJECT TEACHERS/ FDA-CUM-COMPUTER TEACHER/ WARDEN BY THE RESPONDENTS WITHOUT EXTENDING THE BENEFIT OF WEIGHTAGE OF 5% FOR EACH COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE RENDERED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE RESPONDENTS INSTITUTIONS IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE RESPONDENT SOCIETY, VIDE ANNEXURE-F. QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.04.2012 BEARING NO.K.RESS/ADM-2/CR-02/2010-11 PASSED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT, VIDE ANNEXURE-H BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CLAIMS OF THE PETITIONER IN THE LIGHT OF THE RECOMMENDATION MADE BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE RESPONDENT SOCIETY FOR EXTENDING THE BENEFIT OF WEIGHTAGE OF 5% FOR EACH COMPLETED YEARS OF SERVICE RENDERED BY THE PETITIONER IN THE RESPONDENTS INSTITUTIONS AND TILL THEN DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NOT TO PREPARE AND PUBLISH THE FINAL SELECT LIST. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS, IN THE NATURE OF ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION IN THE POST HELD BY THEM IN THE RESPONDENTS INSTITUTIONS AFTER SELECTING AND APPOINTING THEM AS TEACHING/NON-TEACHING EMPLOYEES AND ETC.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:12963 WP No. 80575 of 2013
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
None appears for petitioner. Matter is of year 2013.
Despite service of Court notice, there is no representation. This would indicate that petitioner is not diligent in pursuing
matter. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(RAVI V.HOSMANI) JUDGE
CLK CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 36
ANITA PATIL
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
RAVI V.HOSMANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
