Petitioner sought to challenge amendment of Sec.18(1-A) of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act and a rejuvenation demand for lakes/tanks and water bodies, but withdrew the petition by memo. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, reserving liberty to challenge any fresh notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC-D:7509 WP No. 76792 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 76792 OF 2013 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
GURURAJ NARASIMHA DAS, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: CONTRACTOR, R/O. LAXMI NIVAS, NEAR AARADHANA LODGE, BUS STAND ROAD, BAGALKOT.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. PRASHANTH T. AREGULI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR
Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
(BY SRI. V.S. KALASURMATH, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. K.L. PATIL, ADV. FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE AMENDED SEC.18(1-A) OF KARNATAKA ACT NO.6 OF 2012 OF KARNATAKA TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING (AMENDED) ACT, 2011 AT VIDE ANNEXURE-F IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND UNENFORCEABLE; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE ANNEXURE-A DATED:03/10/2012 AND DEMAND MADE BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR REJUVENATION OF RS.4,80,976 FOR LAKES/TANKS AND WATER BODY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo to
withdraw the petition.
The memo is taken on record and writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In the event fresh notice is issued, liberty is reserved to petitioner to challenge the same.
In view of disposal of the petition, pending interlocutory applications, if any, do not survive for consideration and are disposed of accordingly.
Sd/JUDGE
PMP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
Gururaj Narasimha Das
The State of Karnataka, R/by the Director, Karnataka State Town Planning Board
The Secretary, Town Planning Authority, Navanagar, Bagalkot
Sachin Shankar Magadum
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
