Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite previous orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 7653 OF 2022 (EDN-RES)
BETWEEN:
S. SANTHANAMOORTHY,
S/O SINGARAVEL, AGED 59 YEARS, R/AT NO. 345, ULUNDURPET ROAD, VAYALUR VIRUDACHALAM, CUDDALORE, TAMIL NADU - 606 001.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.L.N. MURTHY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
Digitally signed by NARAYANAPPA LAKSHMAMMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SARITA KULKARNI, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M.C. JAYAKIRTHI, ADVOCATE FOR R3; R2 - SERVED, UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R2 AND 3 TO CONSIDER ANNEXURE-E REPRESENTATION DATED 30.3.2022 GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R2 AND 3 WITHIN SPECIFIED PERIOD AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Despite the order dated 04.03.2024, none appears for the petitioner today also. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, by which the above petition has been dismissed for non-prosecution.
In view thereof, I.A.No.1/2022 stands dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PK CT: BHK
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S. SANTHANAMOORTHY
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
INDIRA PRIYADARSHINI COLLEGE OF LAW
THE REGISTRAR, KARNATAKA STATE LAW UNIVERSITY
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
