A writ petition challenging an interlocutory maintenance order from the Family Court was dismissed as infructuous because the respondent's counsel submitted that the main proceedings had concluded. The court granted no substantive proposition of law; all pending interlocutory applications in the writ petition were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:29588 WP No. 6868 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JULY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 6868 OF 2018 (GM-FC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. SHOBHA POOJARY W/O VINOD JATTI R/A NO.586, 2ND FLOOR BLOCK 37, SMIG, NEAR 5TH PHASE BUS STOP YELAHANKA NEW TOWN BANGALORE-560 064
OFFICE AT: SHOBHA POOJARY ASSISTANT PROFESSOR COMPUTER SCIENCE DEPARTMENT NITTE MEENAKSHI INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY(NMIT) YELAHANKA BANGALORE-560 064
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. GEETHAADEVI M. PAPANNA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. VINOD JATTI S/O LATE SAJEEV JATTI FLAT NO.103, BLOCK I HARSHA MEADOWS, S.G.PALYA C.V.RAMAN NAGAR POST BANGALORE-560 093
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. HEMANTH KUMAR D., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN M.C.2357/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BANGALORE AND MODIFY THE ORDER DATED 8.1.2018 IN M.C.2357/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT
NC: 2024:KHC:29588 WP No. 6868 of 2018
BANGALORE AT ANNEXURE-H AND AWARD MAINTENANCE AND PROVIDE RENTAL EXPENSES AS CLAIMED IN INTERIM APPLICATION I.A.3 AND 5 IN M.C.2357/2015.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this writ petition is filed questioning an interlocutory order and the main proceedings itself is concluded.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
All I.As. in the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/JUDGE
MEG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18
Shobha Poojary
Vinod Jatti
Lalitha Kanneganti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
