Writ petition sought quashing of a private complaint under S.188 IPC and the Karnataka Police Act; petitioner's counsel filed a memo to withdraw, the State did not object, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn without deciding any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT WRIT PETITION NO.65 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. UT KHADAR S/O. LATE HAJI U.T. FAREED, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, NOW SPEAKER OF KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MEMBER OF KARNATAKA LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MANGALORE CONSTITUENCY, R/O. DOOR NO. 1-2, AMMUNJE HOUSE, BOLIYAR VILLAGE, MANGALORE TALUK - 583 230,
AND ALSO OFFICE AT KPCC OFFICE, QUEENS ROAD, GOVINDA CHETTY COLONY, SHIVAJI NAGAR, BENGALURU, KARNATAKA - 560 051.
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by SHARADA VANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SMT. LATHA S SHETTY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:6643 WP No. 65 of 2024
BANGALORE - 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESH, ADDITIONAL SPP FOR R1)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PRIVATE COMPLAINT NO.54122/2022 FILED BY THE R-2 FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S 188 OF INDIAN PENAL CODE 1860 AND SECTION 31 R/W SECTION 103 OF THE KARNATAKA POLICE ACT 1963 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 29TH ADDL. CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE TRANSFERRED TO THE 42ND ADDL (SPL COURT TRIAL CASES FILED AGAINST SITTING AS WELL AS FORMER MPS AND MLA TRIABLE BY THE MAGISTRATE IN THE STATE OF KARNATAKA ) IN SO FAR PETITIONER CONCERNED (ANNX-A) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2. Memo reads as under:
"The Petitioner submit as follows:
Undersigned counsel for Petitioner humbly submit before this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to take the above Memo on record and Permit the Petitioner to withdraw the above case, in the interest of the justice."
3. Learned Additional SPP appearing for the State does
not oppose the request of the petitioner.
In view of the above, the petition is disposed of as having
been withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SMJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
3 provisions across 3 enactments
SRI. UT KHADAR
STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH SHIVAJINAGAR POLICE STATION
SRI. SHARAT BABU R.
KRISHNA S DIXIT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
