Disposed

Sri.M.K. Srinivas v. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Karnataka HC20 Mar 2024WP/6437/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners challenged the allotment of sites requesting direction to respondents to consider their 2021 representation for 50:50 site allotment. The court directed petitioners to submit a fresh representation as the original was not found in records for consideration within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to furnish a fresh representation; respondents to consider it and dispose within three months.

Sri.M.K. Srinivas Vs Mysore Urban Development Authority — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:11442 WP No. 6437 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 6437 OF 2024 (LA-UDA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.M.K. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, S/O LATE KRISHNADAS, R/AT FLAT NO 302, 3RD FLOOR, 14TH MAIN, 6TH CROSS R K LAYOUT, PADMANABHANAGAR, BANGALORE 560070.

¶9

SRI M K NAGARAJ AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, S/O LATE KRISHNADAS, R/AT NO 52, SRI VIJAYA DEEPA, 22ND MAIN, 38TH CROSS, 4TH T BLOCK, JAYANAGARA BANGALORE 560041 REPRESENTED BY THEIR GPA HOLDER,

¶10

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶11

SRI N B MOHANA CHANDRA, S/O LATE BOREGOWDA, AGED MAJOR, R/AT 8, 5TH CROSS, SHIVU EXTENSION, MARIYAPPANA PALYA, BANGALORE 560056.

¶12

…PETITIONERS

¶13

(BY SRI. LOHITASWA BANAKAR., ADVOCATE)

¶14

AND:

¶15

MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURA,

¶16

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:11442 WP No. 6437 of 2024

¶17

CHAMARAJAPURA MOHALLA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE 570005 REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.

¶18

THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER JHANSI RANI LAKSHMI BAI ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURA, CHAMARAJAPURA MOHALLA, LAKSHMIPURAM, MYSORE 570005.

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SMT. SADHANA.S.DESAI., ADVOCATE)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 30.09.2021 MADE BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURE-G AND THEREBY ALLOT SITES IN TERMS OF 50-50 RATIO IN RESPECT OF LANDS MEASURING 10 GUNTAS IN SY NO. 52 AND LAND MEASURING 20 GUNTAS IN SY NO. 53 SITUATED IN BASAVANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The prayer in this Writ Petition is seeking for a direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 30.09.2021, whereby the petitioners are requesting for allotment of a site in terms of 50:50 prescribed therein.

¶25

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:11442 WP No. 6437 of 2024

¶26

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in the records maintained by first respondent’s office, the representation is not forthcoming.

¶27

In view of the above, the petitioners are directed to furnish a fresh representation and if such a representation is submitted, the same shall be considered and disposed of within a period of three months from the date of receipt of

¶28

a copy of this order.

¶29

Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶30

Sd/JUDGE

¶31

hnm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51

Sri.M.K. Srinivas v. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri.M.K. Srinivas v. Mysore Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Chenddyna Schae Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B P Renukamba Vs the Commissioenr

Smt Manjula T D Vs Smt Kanakavalli

Smt. Mamatha Vs M.S. Muniraju

Sri. S.P Sadiq Vs the Commissioner

K Nagamma Vs Smt S Shubha