A writ petition seeking quashing of revenue recovery orders became infructuous as the petitioners availed the One Time Settlement Scheme. The court disposed of the petition accordingly.
The petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 6313 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO. 7/2, CRESCENT ROAD, HIGH GROUNDS BENGALURU 560 001.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. RAGHU PRAKASH BABU D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by ANAND N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. SUMANA BALIGA M., ADVOCATE)
NC: 2024:KHC:43135 WP No. 6313 of 2024
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) QUASH THE 1 ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE , NO. ARO (RRN)/W129/PR-621/2023-24, 2. ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE, NO. ARO (RRN)/W-129/PR-622/23-24. 3. ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE , NO. ARO (RRN)/W-129/PR-623/23-24. 4. ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE , NO. ARO (RRN)/W129/PR-624/23-24 5.ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE , NO. ARO (RRN)/W-129/PR-625/23-24 6. ORDER DATED 18.01.24 VIDE , NO. ARO (RRN)/W-129/PR-626/23-24 PASSED BY R2, WHICH ARE AT ANNEXURES-A TO F RESPECTIVELY, HOLDING THE SAME AS ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND UNJUST.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
This Court on the previous occasion has adjourned the matter to enable the petitioner to avail the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme. Ms. Sumana Baliga M., the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2, submits that the petitioner
NC: 2024:KHC:43135 WP No. 6313 of 2024
has availed the benefit of OTS Scheme and therefore,
the petition is rendered infructuous.
This submission is not controverted. Hence,
the petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous.
Sd/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
SA ct:sr
ASHOK M D
VIJAYA A.D
THE BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
B M SHAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
