Dismissed

Smt Haseena Begum v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC6 Mar 2024WP/6256/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of a BDA office order concerning Bellahalli village. Before any decision, counsel sought withdrawal with liberty to re-approach if acquisition proceedings are initiated; the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Liberty reserved to petitioners to approach the Court again if acquisition proceedings are initiated; petition dismissed as withdrawn.

Smt Haseena Begum Vs State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:9365 WP No. 6256 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 6^TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 6256 OF 2024 (LA-BDA)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SMT HASEENA BEGUM W/O LATE SYED AHMED AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1691, KAMAKSHAMMA LAYOUT VTC, YELAHANKA BENGALURU NORTH, PIN-560064.

¶8

SRI MOHAMMED AKRAM S/O SYED AHMED AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.1691, KAMAKSHAMMA LAYOUT VTC, YELAHANKA BENGALURU NORTH PIN-560064.

¶9

Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶10

SMT DALAMMA W/O LATE SRI MUNIPOOJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.200, BASAVALINGAPPA NAGAR, SAMPIGEHALLI, BENGALURU-560064.

¶11

SRI SYED RAHAMAT S/O SYED SIRAJ AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.2, NEAR GOVT URDU SCHOOL, BELLAHALLI, BENGALURU NORTH PIN-560064.

¶12

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:9365 WP No. 6256 of 2024

¶13

SRI SYED MUNEER S/O SYED MUSTAFA AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.49, BELLAHALLI VTC, BANGALORE NORTH, PO YELAHANKA, BENGALURU-560064.

¶14

SMT PRAVEEN TAJ D/O JAHULLA SHARIF AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.214, C/O ZAFRULLA SHAREEF BELLAHALLI CROSS, NEAR SHAMS SCHOOL, YELAHANKA BENGALURU-560064.

¶15

SRI C J NAZEER AHMED S/O C ABDUL JABBAR, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.132, 1ST MAIN ROAD, HIDAYATH NAGAR, K G HALLI, BANGALORE NORTH, BANGALORE-560045.

¶16

SRI M SHAMSHEER S/O IMAM SAB AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1130/13, FIRST MAIN ROAD, 2ND CROSS, NEAR YESHWNATHAPURA MAIN ROAD, L N COLONY, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560022.

¶17

SMT SYEDA AYMAN BANU C/O SYED OSMAN GHANI AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.55/22, ZAHRA MANZIL BELLAHALLI CROSS, YELAHANKA VTC BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560064.

¶18

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:9365 WP No. 6256 of 2024

¶19

SRI SYED KHADER S/O ABDUL RAZAK AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.219, KOGILU ROAD BELLAHALLIBANDE ROAD, KOGILU LAYOUT, BANGALORE NORTH BANGALORE-560064.

¶20

…PETITIONERS

¶21

(BY SRI. PRITHVEESH.M.K., ADVOCATE)

¶22

AND:

¶23

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001.

¶24

THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (BDA) T CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST BENGALURU-560020

¶25

…RESPONDENTS

¶26

(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA FOR R-1; SRI.B.LETHIF., ADVOCATE FOR R-2)

¶27

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE OFFICE ORDER DATED 19/02/2024 IN NO. BDA/U.AA(BHOOSWA)/605/2023-24 ISSUED BY THE R2 A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-T SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO BELLAHALLI VILLAGE, ETC.

¶28

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶29

¶30

NC: 2024:KHC:9365 WP No. 6256 of 2024

¶31

ORDER

¶32

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court in the event, the respondents initiate acquisition proceedings.

¶33

His submission is placed on record. Reserving liberty

¶34

to the petitioners to approach this Court once again, if need arises, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶35

Sd/JUDGE

¶36

PKS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34

Smt Haseena Begum v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Haseena Begum v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G K Prasanna Vs the Chairman and Managing Director

Mr. Kishore Kumar S N Vs Mr. Narasimha Prasad T K

Sri K Hanumantharayappa Vs the State of Karnataka

Karnataka Bank Ltd., Vs Sri. Rajashekar. J

The Project Director Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Competent Authority

Syed Khaleem Vs the District Wakf Committee