KSRTC challenged a Labour Court award reinstating its workman. Before Lok Adalat the parties settled: KSRTC to reinstate the workman with continuity of service, without back wages or consequential benefits; writ petition disposed of by modifying the award.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, BENGALURU BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024
CONCILIATORS PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
&
SRI. P.D. SUBRAMANYA, MEMBER
W.P. No. 58115/2018 (Lok Adalat No.568/2024)
BETWEEN:
Karnataka State Road, Transport Corporation, Mysore Urban Division, Bannimantap, Mysore,
By its Divisional Controller,
Now represented by its Chief Law Officer.
...PETITIONER
(By Smt. H R Renuka, Advocate)
AND
Syed Mohammad Fazil, S/o Khaji Mohammed Gaij, Adult, R/o. No. 195, I Stage, Nimra Masque Road, Rajiv Nagar, Mysuru-570001.
RESPONDENT (Respondent - Party-in-person - present)
2
THIS WRIT PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE AWARD DATED 14.12.2017 IN REF. NO. 71/2016 PASSED BY THE LABOUR COURT, MYSORE (ANNEXURE-K).
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION BEFORE LOK ADALAT, THE FOLLOWING CONCILIATION ORDER IS PASSED.
CONCILIATION ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the award passed
by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru in Reference No.71/2016 dated 14.12.2017 Vide Annexure-K.
"The WP filed against the Award in REF NO.71/2016 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru, dated 14.12.2017 has been referred to this Lok Adalat by the Hon'ble High Court U/S 20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987. The parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms:
3
The Petitioner - KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the Respondent - workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits, without back wages from the date of dismissal (30/09/2014) till the date of actual reinstatement. This settlement will not come in the way of corporation reopening the cases which were filed on account of dismissal of the respondent. Respondent - Workman has agreed for the said settlement".
dated 14.12.2017 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru in Ref. No.71/2016 vide Annexure 'K'.
Sd/JUDGE
Sd/MEMBER
RAK
4
FILED BEFORE LOK ADALAT HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE,BENGALURU BEFORE THE HIGH COURT LOK ADALAT WP. NO. 58115/2018 (LOK ADALATH NO. 568/2024)
PETITIONER: KSRTC
….Petitioner/s
AND:
SYED MOHAMMAD FAZIL …Repondent/s
JOINT MEMO
The WP filed against the Award in REF. NO. 71/2016 on the File of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Mysuru, dated 14/12/2017 has been referred to this LokAdalat by the Hon'ble High Court U/S.20 of the Legal Services Authorities Act.1987. The parties to the appeal have settled their claim before the Lok Adalat on the following terms:
The Petitioner - KSRTC has agreed to reinstate the Respondent workman into service with continuity of service, without consequential benefits, without back wages from the date of dismissal (30/09/2014) till the date of actual reinstatement. This settlement will not come in the way of corporation reopening the cases which were filed on account of dismissal of the respondent.
Respondent – Workman has agreed for the said settlement.
The parties to this petition have set their hands to this settlement before the Lok Adalat in the presence of Conciliators on this 25/01/2024 at Bengaluru Bench.
Sd/- Sd/-
SIGNATURE OF PETITIONER SIGNATURE OF RESPONDENT
Sd/-
ADVOCATE FOR PETITIONER ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation, Mysore Urban Division
Syed Mohammad Fazil
K.S. Hemalekha
P.D. Subramanya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
