the condition whereby an amount of Rs.25,00,000/- has to be paid to the wife. It is the case of the husband that he has already paid the amount by way of cash. This Court is not able to appreciate the said contention raised on behalf of the petitioner/husband. The terms of MOU clearly states that it has to be in the form of fixed deposit. Now he cannot take such a stand that he has paid by way of cash. Even if he has paid the amount by way of cash, it is in subsequent proceedings if at all initiated by the wife, it is for the husband to prove those things before the appropriate Court. Now, the only issue that fell for consideration before the Court below was whether the terms of the compromise, particularly that an amount of Rs.25,00,000/was reflected in the judgment and decree. The said term is not reflected in the decree. Unless and until that is reflected, in the decree. The decree cannot be executed. The Court below had rightly considered all these aspects and rightly allowed the petition by incorporating the said clause in the decree. Now, in this case, the Court cannot go into the aspect whether the husband has paid the amount or not, what is the manner of payment, the husband has to prove in an appropriate proceedings and not before this Court. In the considered
