The petitioner failed to appear before the Court on three consecutive listing dates despite specific directions. The Court found the petitioner uninterested in prosecuting the matter and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:22856 WP No. 52855 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 52855 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SRI. MOHAMMED ZAMEER S/O MOHAMMED MUNNAVAR AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT NO.4381, GHANDINAGAR OPP TAPMCS MILL, BANGARPET 563114
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. BHARATH L, ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. V SHIVA REDDY, AGA FOR R1:
SRI. H DEVENDRAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECT THE R-2 TO MAKE DETAILED ENQUIRY WITH LEGAL ACTIONS AGAINST R-3 FOR THE CREATING FAKE STORIES AND MISUSING OF POWER AND HARASSING THE PETITIOENR AND TO DIRECT AND TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE R-3 FOR HIS UNLAWFUL ACTS AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
NC: 2024:KHC:22856 WP No. 52855 of 2017
in prosecuting the case. Hence, the writ petition is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear despite multiple listings?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
MOHAMMED ZAMEER
STATE OF KARNATAKA
JOINT COMMISSIONER BRHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
ARO BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
