This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to quash an office order was dismissed by the High Court of Karnataka as having become infructuous.
The petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO. 51014 OF 2019 (S-TR)
BETWEEN:
RAJANNA S/O BOMME GOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, NOW WORKING AS DEPUTY DIRECTOR BUILDING LICENCE CELL-NORTH OFFICE OF THE JOINT DIRECTOR, BUILDING LICENCE CELL-NORTH, DEPARTMENT OF TOWN PLANNING BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, ANNEXE-II, N R SQUARE BENGALURU-560002. …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SHIVAPRASAD SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PALIKE, N R SQUARE BENGALURU-560002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI K N PUTTEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI VIJAYA KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH OFFICE ORDER BEARING NO.B12(6)PR/204/19-20 DATED 16.11.2019 (UNDER ANNEXURE-H TO THE WRIT PETITION) ISSUED BY THE R-1 BY ISSUE OF A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND GRANT ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions
submits that the petition has become infructuous.
Submission is taken on record.
Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
CA
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
RAJANNA S/O BOMME GOWDA
BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BY ITS COMMISSIONER
M BASAVARAJU S/O MUNISWAMY
SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
