This writ petition is disposed of with directions to Respondent 4 to consider objections related to scheduled property, as mandated in a prior W.P. No. 16438/2008, within four weeks from receipt of the order.
Directed Respondent 4 to consider objections filed and intimate outcome within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 5064 OF 2022 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI MANJUNATH GOWDA K E S/O LATE K B ERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/AT KOTIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HARATI POST, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 560 103.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. NARENDRA P R., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA
Location: High Court of Karnataka
NC: 2024:KHC:21336 WP No. 5064 of 2022
KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 103.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. B.P.RADHA., AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. B.J.SOMAYAJI., ADVOCATE FOR R5;)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TODIRECT THE R2 TO 5 TO CONSIDER REPRESENTATION DATED 17.09.2009 VIDE ANNEXURE-G GRANT AN INTERIM ORDER OF RESTRAINING THE RESPONDENTS FROM DISPOSSESSING THE PETITIONER FROM THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY BEARING SY.NO.77/5 TO AN EXTENT OF 25 GUNTAS, SITUATED AT KOTIGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HUTTUR HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In this writ petition, petitioner has sought for direction
to the respondent Nos.2 to 5, to consider the objection filed by the petitioner as per the Annexure-G, pursuant to the order dated 19.08.2009 in WP.No.16438/2008 (Annexure-F).
NC: 2024:KHC:21336 WP No. 5064 of 2022
and the same may be made known to the petitioner within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
According, the writ petition is disposed of .
SD/JUDGE
KVR
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56
2 issues framed by the court
Whether Respondents 2 to 5 are directed to consider the petitioner's objection regarding scheduled property.
Whether Respondent 4 is directed to intimate its decision or act in compliance within a specified timeframe.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI MANJUNATH GOWDA K E
DIGITALLY SIGNED
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOLAR DISTRICT
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOLAR SUB DIVISION
THE THASILDHAR, KOLAR TALUK
PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
E.S.INDIRESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
