The High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging a demand notice and assessment order after the petitioners submitted they were ready to pay the demanded amount without prejudice to their rights.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5034 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SMT. SINDHU V.,ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONERS
AND:
BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE CORPORATION OFFICES N.R.SQUARE, J.C.ROAD BANGALORE-560 002.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.PAWAN KUMAR AND SRI. DEVENDRAPPA., ADVOCATES FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE DEMAND NOTICE DATED:25.8.2016 ISSUED BY R-4 TO PETITIONER NO.2 VIDE ANNEX-A.SET ASIDE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED:2.12.2016 ISSUED BY R-4 TO PETITIONER NO.2 VIDE ANNEXURE-B AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
NC: 2024:KHC:21913 WP No. 5034 of 2017
ORDER
submits that the petitioners are ready to pay the amount demanded by the respondents as per Annexure-A without prejudice to their rights.
Sd/JUDGE
HA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lakme Lever Private Limited
Lakme Salon
Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Corporation
The Special Commissioner (Revenue and Advertisements)
The Assistant Commissioner (Advertisements)
Assistant Revenue Officer Domlur Sub Division
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
