Writ petitions challenged family court orders on interlocutory applications in a maintenance proceeding. Since the underlying criminal miscellaneous case was withdrawn and dismissed as withdrawn, the high court dismissed the writ petitions as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:33138 WP No. 48648 of 2017 C/W WP No. 48649 of 2017 WP No. 48650 of 2017 AND 2 OTHERS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
WRIT PETITION NO. 48648 OF 2017 (GM-FC) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 48649 OF 2017 (GM-FC) WRIT PETITION NO. 48650 OF 2017 (GM-FC) WRIT PETITION NO. 48651 OF 2017 (GM-FC) WRIT PETITION NO. 48652 OF 2017 (GM-FC)
IN W.P.No.48648/2017
BETWEEN:
R. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI. RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDNG AT NO.81, 9TH CROSS, KPA BLOCK, WARD NO.132, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 040.
…PETITIONER
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN
Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. R ANIL KUMAR., PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
SMT. S.VEENA W/O R.ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING AT CHANDRASKEHARPURA, GUBBI TLAUK, TUMKUR -572 216.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ANIKETH K.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2017 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRL.
NC: 2024:KHC:33138 WP No. 48648 of 2017 C/W WP No. 48649 of 2017 WP No. 48650 of 2017 AND 2 OTHERS
JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON I.A.20 FILED UNDER SEC. 65-A AND 65-B OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 BY THE PETITIONER IN CRL. MISC. 459/2012 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
IN W.P.No.48649/2017
BETWEEN:
R. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI. RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDNG AT NO.81, 9TH CROSS, KPA BLOCK, WARD NO.132, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.ANIL KUMAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
SMT. S.VEENA W/O R. ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESDIING AT CHANDRASKEHARPURA, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR -572 216.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ANIKETH K.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2017 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON I.A.17 FILED UNDER SEC. 91 R/W SEC. 311 OF CR. P.C., BY PETITIONER IN CRL. MISC. 459/2012 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
IN W.P.No.48650/2017
BETWEEN:
R. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI. RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS
NC: 2024:KHC:33138 WP No. 48648 of 2017 C/W WP No. 48649 of 2017 WP No. 48650 of 2017 AND 2 OTHERS
RESIDNG AT NO.81, 9TH CROSS, KPA BLOCK, WARD NO.132, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.ANIL KUMAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
SMT. S. VEENA W/O R. ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDNG AT CHANDRASKEHARPURA, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR -572 216.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ANIKETH K.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 17.10.2017 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON I.A.16 FILED UNDER SEC. 91 R/W SEC. 311 OF CR. P.C., BY PETITIONER IN CRL. MISC. 459/2012 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
IN W.P.No.48651/2017
BETWEEN:
R. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI. RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS RESIDNG AT NO.81, 9TH CROSS, KPA BLOCK, WARD NO.132, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU -560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R. ANIL KUMAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
SMT. S. VEENA W/O R. ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
RESDING AT CHANDRASKEHARPURA GUBBI TLAUK, TUMKUR -572 216.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ANIKETH K.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 17.10.2017 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON I.A.NO.19 FILED UNDER SECTION 311, CR.P.C. BY THE PETITIONER IN CRL.MISC.459/2012 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
IN W.P.No.48652/2017
BETWEEN:
R. ANIL KUMAR S/O SRI. RANGASWAMY AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS REIDING AT BNO.81, 9TH CROSS, KPA BLOCK, WARD NO.132, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU 560 040.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R ANIL KUMAR, PARTY-IN-PERSON)
AND:
SMT. S. VEENA W/O R. ANIL KUMAR AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESIDING AT CHANDRASHEKHARPURA, GUBBI TALUK, TUMKUR -572 216.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.ANIKETH K.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SACHIN B.S., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED: 17.10.2017 AT ANNEXURE-E PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU ON I.A.NO.18
FILED UNDER SECTION 311, CR.P.C. BY THE PETITIONER IN CRL.MISC.NO.459/2012 BY ISSUING A WRIT OF CERTIORARI.
THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
The party in person as well as the learned counsel for the respondent are present before this Court. It is submitted that all these Writ Petitions are arising out of I.As. filed in Crl.Misc.No.459/2012. It is submitted that the wife had filed the memo of withdrawal seeking permission to withdraw the Crl. Misc. No.459/2012. Considering the same, the Trial Court had dismissed the criminal miscellaneous as withdrawn.
‘ dismissed’ as infructuous.
SD/(LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN, List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5
4 provisions across 2 enactments
R. ANIL KUMAR
SMT. S. VEENA
LALITHA KANNEGANTI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
