Writ petition by a trade union centre and individual workmen against an employer and labour authorities was called on for preliminary hearing; no representation appeared for the petitioners on multiple listings over five years, and the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO.48330 OF 2018 (L-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. VIJAYA KRISHNA BHAT.M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
(BY SRI. S.N.MURTHY., SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SOMASHEKAR., ADVOCATE R1; SMT. V.SPOORTHI., HCGP FOR R2 AND R3; SRI. K.SRINIVASA., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of petitioners either personally or through video conferencing.
NC: 2023:KHC:38980 WP No. 48330 of 2018
Sri.S.N.Murthy., learned Senior counsel on behalf of Sri.Somashekar., for respondent No.1 has appeared through video conferencing and Smt.Spoorthi.V., learned HCGP for respondents 2 & 3 has appeared in person.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 11.08.2023. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of petitioners.
The petition is listed today. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of petitioners. The petition is filed in the year 2018. Now we are in the month of November 2023. The petition is pending since five years. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition.
As already noted above, when the matter is called there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/JUDGE
MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 13.1
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Karnataka Trade Union Centre represented by its President Sri. G.R. Shivashankar
Smt. Bhagya B.R
Smt. Nagalakshmi Y.N
Smt. Vimala Bai V
Smt. Kamalamma H
Smt. V. Geetha Bali
Jyoti Mulimani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
