Govinda Matti v. Mangalore University
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court held that the University must revisit the denial of increment benefits to the petitioners, who were office bearers of a trade union and similarly circumstanced with an employee whose appellate appeal was allowed. The Court directed the respondent to consider revisiting the decision to ensure parity of treatment. This case does not quash the orders but directs reconsideration of bene
What did the court decide?
Directed the second respondent to revisit the decision on increment benefits to ensure parity with a similarly circumstanced employee whose appeal was allowed.