The High Court of Karnataka disposed of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. On the day of hearing, the petitioner withdrew the petition via memo, leading to its dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 4621 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
P.KAILASAM AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, S/O SRI PANCHAPAKESAN R/AT NO. 1167A, 4TH BLOCK, 5TH MAIN, HBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE - 560 043
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. N GOWTHAM RAGHUNATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by BS RAVIKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.H.B.RUDRESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD.20.2.2021 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE CITY CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE (CCH-35) IN EX.CASE No.4169/2018 (ANENURE-A).
NC: 2024:KHC:9782 WP No. 4621 of 2021
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is placed on record.
In view of the memo, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
rs
P.KAILASAM
SAVIRASA TELE FILMS
WHITE HORSE NETWORK SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
