Writ petition challenging enforcement of an acquisition scheme for property lands. The petitioners were absent from the hearing, leading the court to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution as they showed no interest in continuing the litigation.
None granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION No. 45311 OF 2014 (LA-BDA)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
BANGALORE – 560 076.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI GURUBASAPPA H, ADVOCATE - ABSENT)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI YOGESH D NAIK, AGA FOR R1 SRI K KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO NOT ENFORCE THE SCHEME CALLED "JAYAPRAKASHNARAYAN NAGAR 8TH PHASE" IN
RESPECT OF PETITIONERS PROPERTIES AS SHOWN IN THE ABOVE TABLE IN THE LAND BEARING SY.No.45/1, OF KOTHNUR VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK IN VIEW OF LAPSE OF ACQUISITION SCHEME IN TERMS OF SECTION 27 R/W. SECTION 36 OF THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, 1976, ON THE MERITS OF JUDGEMENT & ORDER OF THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN OFFSHORE HOLDINGS PVT., LTD. VS.BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REPORTED IN [2011] 3 SCC 139 PARA-124 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioners even though the matter is called out for the second time. On the last date of hearing also, learned counsel for the petitioners has remained absent.
It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution .
SD/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Kiran.G.
S P Guruvidyaranya
Jyothi
K Lokanadha Naidu
I Shreekanth Reddy
K Bharathi
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
