Writ petition challenging an interlocutory order of the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Pavagada in O.S.No.391/16 was dismissed after petitioners' counsel filed a memo stating it did not survive for consideration; pending IAs stood disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:5259 WP No. 44694 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
WRIT PETITION NO. 44694 OF 2017 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by PAVITHRA N Location: high court of karnataka
R/AT NEAR S.S.K. RANGAMANDIRS, OLD BUS STAND, PAVAGADA TOWN, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI: ERAPPA REDDY .M., ADVOCATE)
AND:
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
ALL ARE R/AT PAVAGADA TOWN, PAVAGADA TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEX-E NAMELY
THE ORDER PASSED BY THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, PAVAGADA ON I.A.NO.11 ON 23.8.2017 IN O.S.NO.391/16. TO AWARD COSTS OF THIS PETITION AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the memo
dated 08.02.2023 contending that the petition does not survive
for consideration and accordingly, same may be dismissed.
Memo is taken on record.
same does not survive for consideration.
In view of dismissal of the main petition, pending IA's if
any, stands disposed of.
Sd/JUDGE
PN
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30
M. V. Vinayanag
Padma Prakash
Sheela S. Kumar
M.S. Shankaranag
Ramanjinappa
Deputy Commissioner, Tumkur District
M G Uma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
