A writ petition filed to quash directions to initiate a Section 340 Cr.P.C. complaint was dismissed. The Court held that due to the abatement of the petition after a grant of indulgence for legal heirs without any subsequent steps, the matter could not be pursued further.
Discontinued the writ petition by dismissal due to abatement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 39412 OF 2016 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by BS RAVIKUMAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. R A DEVANAND.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K ANANDA.,ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4;
SRI. RAVI H K.,ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE DIRECTIONS AS ORDERED BY THE II ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE AT MYSORE TO II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT MYSORE, DTD 10.2.2016 TO INITIATE A COMPLAINT U/S 340 OF CR.P.C AGAINST THESE PETITIONERS WHICH IS PART OF JUDGEMENT AND SAME IS PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION.
NC: 2024:KHC:13096 WP No. 39412 of 2016
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDES, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Despite grant of indulgence to bring legal heirs of
deceased respondent No.1, no steps are taken indeed.
Sd/JUDGE
PHM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2
SMT JAYAMMA W/O SRI PUTTASWAMY OTHS
SMT SAROJA W/O SRI MAHADEVU OTHS
SRI SHIVANNA S/O LATE CHIKKAMAHADEVA GOWDA OTHS
SMT PUTTAMA W/O MADEGOWDA
SMT SHIVAMMA W/O NAGARAJU
SMT GUNDAMMA W/O LATE BYREGOWA
R. NATARAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
