Property tax show cause notices challenged by writ petition. Petitioner availed the one-time settlement scheme; court recorded submission that any excess deposit be adjusted against future tax and dismissed the petition as nothing survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:33202 WP No. 3692 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT PETITION NO. 3692 OF 2024 (LB-TAX)
BETWEEN:
ARVIND R AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, S/O LATE A P RAMANNA, R/O NO.10, 1st CROSS, K G ROAD EXTENSION, OPP. MENAKA THEATER, GANDHINAGAR BENGALURU 560009
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. CHIDAMBARA G S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. BATHE GOWDA K.V., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE SHOW CAUSE NOTICES DTD 17.01.2023 BEARING NO. ARO(CKP)/W-109/PR-920/2020-21, VIDE ANNEXURE-C, BEARING NO. ARO (CKP)/W-109/PR-921/2020-21, VIDE ANNEXURE-C1, BEARING NO. ARO(CKP)/W-109/PR-922/202021, VIDE ANNEXURE-C2, BEARING NO. ARO(CKP)/W-109/PR923/2020-21, VIDE ANNEXURE-C3, AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has availed the benefit of 'one-time settlement' scheme and submits that if any amount deposited in
excess to the arrears of property tax, same shall be adjust to the future tax.
2. The submission is placed on record.
time settlement' scheme, nothing survives for
NC: 2024:KHC:33202 WP No. 3692 of 2024
consideration in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
petitioner has deposited the excess tax, the respondents are directed to adjust the same in future tax.
Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE
SSB
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives after the petitioner availed the one-time settlement scheme for property tax arrears.
Arvind R
The Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike represented by its Chief Commissioner
The Chief Commissioner, Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
The Assistant Revenue Officer, Chickpet Sub Division, BBMP
Ashok S. Kinagi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
