Petitioner sought directions to BBMP to consider her representations; counsel filed a memo stating the prayer did not survive due to subsequent events and sought dismissal as infructuous. The High Court took the memo on record and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 364 OF 2017 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
SMT UMASWAMY W/O LATE K.V.GOPALASWAMY AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS R/AT NO.914/5, 21ST MAIN 38TH CROSS, IV T BLOCK JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560041
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANIVANNAN G.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3)
NC: 2024:KHC:20376 WP No. 364 of 2017
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 3.11.2014 AT 26.07.2016 AND 22.11.2016 ANNEXURED TO F RESPECTIVELY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sd/JUDGE
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45
DM
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT UMASWAMY W/O LATE K.V. GOPALASWAMY
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
THE ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER JAYANAGAR RANGE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
BENGALURU METROPOLITAN TASK FORCE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
