Dismissed

S. Murali Krishna v. Special Deputy Commisisoner - 3

Karnataka HC20 Dec 2024WP/34705/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition sought direction to consider representations for enhancement of land acquisition compensation. Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to challenge the Arbitrator's order dated 27.06.2024; the court dismissed it as withdrawn reserving that liberty.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the order dated 27.06.2024 passed by respondent No.1.

S. Murali Krishna Vs Special Deputy Commisisoner - 3 — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:53109 WP No. 34705 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 20^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.34705 OF 2024 (LA-RES)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

S. MURALI KRISHNA S/O LATE R. SHIVASHANKAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, NO. 728, RAMAIAH COMPLEX, OPPOSITE TO GIRIA SHOWROOM, T DASARHALLI, BENGALURU - 560057.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI. V. B. SIDDARAMAIAH, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶12

SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISISONER - 3 AND ARBITRATOR, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, KANADAYA BHAVAN, K G ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 009.

¶13

SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY, NO. 678/3, NEERU BHAVI KEMPANNA BADAVANE, HEBBALA, BENGALURU -560023.

¶14

…RESPONDENTS

¶15

(BY SRI. MANJUNATH K., HCGP)

¶16

¶17

NC: 2024:KHC:53109 WP No. 34705 of 2024

¶18

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.1 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION VIDE ANNEXURE-F DATED 05.08.2024 AND ANNX-G DATED 13.12.2024 FOR ADJUDICATION OF ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION IN RESPECT OF PROPERTY BEARING 9/1B, 1A1 MEASURING 675.73 SQ.FT OF CHOKKASANDRA VILLAGE, YESWANTHPURA HOBLI,

¶19

BANGALORE NORTH TALUK.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶21

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

After arguing the matter for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with liberty to challenge the Order dated 27.06.2024 passed by the first respondent - Special Deputy Commissioner - 3 & Arbitrator, vide Annexure-D.

¶24

¶25

NC: 2024:KHC:53109 WP No. 34705 of 2024

¶26

Accepting the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, reserving liberty as prayed for, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶27

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶28

sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29

S. Murali Krishna v. Special Deputy Commisisoner - 3

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S. Murali Krishna v. Special Deputy Commisisoner - 3

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri B H Honnappa Vs the State of Karnataka

T.B.R. Boranna Vs State of Karnataka

Smt. Kota Manjula Vs the Commissioner

Sri Shivalingaiah Vs the State of Karnataka

Kum Keerthi Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Harshita S Vs the Commissioner