Writ petition under Article 227 challenging an interlocutory order on an application under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC in a pending civil suit; the petitioner withdrew the petition after arguing it for some time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 34564 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
SMT. RENUKA SESHADRI W/O SANTOSH KANKANALU AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/A BHAVAN TOWER, NEAR MAI TOWER, FLAT NO.109, 1ST FLOOR, NAHADA-1 DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES REPRESENTED BY HER GPA HOLDER SRI. SESHADRI NAIDU R. AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, S/O LATE RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, R/A NO.113, SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD, NEAR BBMP OFFICE, DODDAKANAHALLI, BANGALORE - 560 035. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SURESH S LOKRE, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHRAVAN S LOKRE, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
SMT. SHOBHA PRABHAKAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, W/O K.S PRABHAKAR, R/A NO.116/117, 1ST CROSS, BANASHANKARI 3RD STAGE, 5TH BLOCK, BANGALORE - 560 085.
…RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A) ALLOW THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION; B) SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26/11/2024 AT ANNEXURE-A PASSED UNDER I.A NO. 27 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT / DEFENDANT UNDER ORDER
XVIII RULE 17 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, AND DIRECT THE LEARNED TRIAL COURT TO PROCEED THE SUIT ON ITS MERITS ON OS NO.422/2017, PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE LEARNED VIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH-15, BENGALURU CITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL ORDER
Learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing the petition for some time, sought permission to withdraw the petition.
In view of the aforesaid submission, the petition is
dismissed as withdrawn .
Sd/-
(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
SMA
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 50
Smt. Renuka Seshadri
Smt. Shobha Prabhakar
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
