A writ petition sought a direction to consider the petitioner's application for details of movable and immovable properties attached. The court issued a mandamus directing the Competent Authority to consider the representation within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 34436 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
SRI. ANAND BALAKRISHNA APPUGOL S/O LATE BALAKRISHNA LAXMANARAO APPUBOL, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, CHAIRMAN, SHREE KRANTIVEER SANGOLLI RAYANNA URBAN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS, RESIDING AT PLOT NO. 2, 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS, 2ND STAGE, HANUMAN NAGAR, BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA 590 019.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. KARTHIK V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N.B. PATIL, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 13/12/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER AND DISPOSE OF THE SAME EXPEDITIOUSLY A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
ORAL ORDER
No.2, which has been received by respondent No.2 on 13.12.2024, and in the said application, the petitioner
has sought for details of the properties which have been attached, both movable and immovable. Though the petition has been filed in quite earnest in as much as the application was submitted on 12.12.2024 and no time has been even granted to respondent No.2 to respond.
ORDER
received by respondent No.2 on
13.12.2024 within a period of three
weeks.
Sd/(SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
TMP
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20
1 issue framed by the court
Whether respondent No.2 should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation seeking details of attached properties.
Sri. Anand Balakrishna Appugol
State of Karnataka represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Development
The Competent Authority, Assistant Commissioner
Suraj Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
