Writ petition challenging an order allowing amendment of written statement in a commercial suit was withdrawn by the petitioners' memo and dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 34401 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 - NC: 2024:KHC:52769 WP No. 34401 of 2024
…PETITIONERS
(BY SMT. VIDYA PAI, ADVOCATE FOR SMT. NAYANA TARA B.G., ADVOCATE)
AND:
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS MR. S.S. ZAMEER AHMED AND GHANI HANEEF
WITH PID NUMBER 91-96-67 MILLERS ROAD, BENSON TOWN, CORPORATION WARD NO. 91, BANGALORE - 560 042
…RESPONDENTS
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED. 25.11.2024 PASSED ON I.A. NO.4 IN COM.O.S.NO. 299/2023 BY THE LXXXV ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU (CCH-86) (COMMERCIAL COURT) PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY REJECT IA NO.4 FOR AMENDMENT OF WRITTEN STATEMENT FILED BY THE PETITIONERS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-E AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
NC: 2024:KHC:52769 WP No. 34401 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners
to withdraw this writ petition.
dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
PHM
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 68 CT:SNN
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ms. Shazia Fathima Ahmed @ Shazia Ahmed
Mrs. Tasneem Fathima @ Tasneem Fathima Magrabi @ Tasneem Fathima Ahmed
Mr. Mohammed Amaan Shahbaaz
Mr. Ali Adnan Shahbaaz
M/s Taj Palace
Mr. S.S. Zameer Ahmed
R. Nataraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
