Writ filed in 2018 quashing a civil judgment dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on multiple dates. No substantive relief was granted.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.34369 OF 2018 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
[BY SRI K.S. NARAYANASWAMY, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI CUCKOO DELHI & SRI H.E. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATES)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER BY GRANTING FOLLOWING RELIEFS: A) QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 16.07.2018 PASSED BY THE COURT OF V ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU ON I.A.NO.5 IN O.S.NO.5817/2013 VIDE ANNEXURE-E, ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
None appears for the petitioner. Even on the last date of hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. The writ petition is of the year 2018. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
hkh.
Sri Kempanna M.
Sri H. Siddalingappa @ Siddalingaiah
Smt. Padma
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
