Disposed

Smt Prema S v. Mysuru Urban Development Authority

Karnataka HC10 Dec 2024WP/33480/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought a direction to Mysuru Urban Development Authority to execute a registered sale deed for site No.11316/F at Vijayanagara 4th Stage, Mysuru pursuant to her representation. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the Court directed respondent No.1 to consider the representation in accordance with law within three months and disposed of the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.1 to consider petitioner's representation dated 24 June 2024 in accordance with law within three months.

Smt Prema S Vs Mysuru Urban Development Authority — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:50918 WP NO.33480 OF 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 10^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.33480 OF 2024 (LA-UDA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT. PREMA S. W/O LATE NANJAPA N. AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS R/AT NO.2590/1, RAMAMANDIRA ROAD, V.V. MOHALLA, MYSURU - 570 002.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. K.R. LINGARAJU, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, J.L.B. ROAD, MYSURU - 570 005.

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, J.L.B. RAOD MYSURU - 570 005.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:50918 WP NO.33480 OF 2024

¶20

REPRESENTATION DATED 24^TH JUNE, 2024 TO EXECUTE THE REGISTERED SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF THE SITE BEARING NO.11316/F MEASURING 20 X 30 FEET IN THE LAYOUT KNOWN AS VIJAYANAGARA 4^TH STAGE, 2^ND PHASE, MYSURU IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER VIDE ANNEXURE-D; AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Sri. T.P. Vivekananda, learned counsel accepts notice for

¶24

respondents.

¶25

The petitioner herein is seeking direction to the respondents to consider the representation dated 24^th June, 2024 filed by the petitioner for executing the registered Sale Deed in respect of site bearing No.11316/F measuring 20 X 30 feet situate at Vijayanagara 4^th Stage, 2^nd Phase, Mysuru in favour of the petitioner.

¶26

Heard Sri. K.R. Lingaraju, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. T.P. Vivekananda, learned counsel appearing for respondents.

¶27

Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and taking into account the factual aspects on record,

¶28

¶29

NC: 2024:KHC:50918 WP NO.33480 OF 2024

¶30

without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, respondent No.1 is directed to consider the representation made by the petitioner dated 24^th June, 2024 (Annexure-D) in accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of this order. Accordingly, writ petition is

¶31

disposed of.

¶32

SD/(E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶33

ARK

Smt Prema S v. Mysuru Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Prema S v. Mysuru Urban Development Authority

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri K Srinivasa Vs the Spl Land Acquisition Officer

Madhuri P Kagi Vs State of Karnataka

B. M. Anjaneya Murthy Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Muni Reddy Vs the Commissioner

Smt Lakshmi Devi Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Shamshad Begum Vs the Commissioner