Disposed

Sri Manjunatha v. the Commissioner

Karnataka HC9 Dec 2024WP/33082/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition seeking a direction to the Bangalore Development Authority to consider the petitioner's representation for execution of an absolute sale deed for a site in Sir M. Vishweshwaraiah Layout. Without expressing any opinion on merits, the High Court directed the BDA to consider the representation within three months and disposed of the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sri Manjunatha Vs the Commissioner — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

NC: 2024:KHC:50619 WP No. 33082 of 2024

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 09^TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.33082 OF 2024 (BDA)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI. MANJUNATHA, S/O LATE VENKATARAMANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/AT MUDDAYYAPALYA, VISHWANEEDAM POST, BENGALURU - 560 091.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. VASANTHKUMAR H.T., ADVOCATE FOR SMT. SUPRITHA K.H., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶13

THE COMMISSIONER THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK EAST, BENGALURU - 560020.

¶14

THE DEPUTY SECRETARY - 3 THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK EAST, BENGALURU - 560020.

¶15

…RESPONDENTS

¶16

(BY SRI. N.R. GIRISH, ADVOCATE)

¶17

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO

¶18

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:50619 WP No. 33082 of 2024

¶19

DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PETITIONER DATED 26.11.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-K FOR ALLOT AND EXECUTE THE ABSOLUTE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF SITE BEARING NO.2086, MEASURING 12 X 18 METERS, SITUATED AT SIR. M. VISHWESHWARAIAH LAYOUT 8^TH BLOCK, IN LIEU OF SITE BEARING NO.2484 AND 2485 7^TH BLOCK, SIR M.VISHWESHWARAIAH LAYOUT.

¶20

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH

¶21

ORAL ORDER

¶22

Sri. N.R. Girish, learned counsel accepts notice for respondent-BDA.

¶23

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the

¶24

parties.

¶25

In this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner is with regard to non-consideration of his representation dated 26.11.2024 by the respondents produced at Annexure-K to the writ petition.

¶26

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:50619 WP No. 33082 of 2024

¶27

In that view of the matter, without

¶28

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent-Bangalore Development Authority is directed to consider the representation dated 26.11.2024 (Annexure-K) within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the writ petition is

¶29

disposed of .

¶30

SD/(E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE

¶31

SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19

Sri Manjunatha v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sri Manjunatha v. the Commissioner

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G H Nagaraj Vs State of Karnataka

Sri. Santosh P. G. Vs the Commissioner

Narayanaswamy C Vs M/S Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation

Smt. Varalakshmamma Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Manju N Jadav Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Susan Cherian Vs State of Karnataka