Writ Petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution dismissed for default as petitioner was absent and prior office objections remained unattended.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2024 BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3221 OF 2024 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
MR. K. GIRISH KUMAR NAIDU S/O. M. KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT NO. 347, HOODI MAIN ROAD, DEVASANDRA, AYYAPPANAGAR, BANGALORE NORTH, K.R. PURAM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA-560 036.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SIRAJUDDIN AHMED.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
Digitally signed by ANAND N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
AND:
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF BBMP N.R. SQUARE, BBMP HEAD OFFICE, BANGALORE-560 002.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
NC: 2024:KHC:45598 WP No. 3221 of 2024
a) DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO INVESTIGATE THIS MATTER SERIOUSLY AND TAKE SUITABLE ACTION ON CASAGRAND LORENZA AND ITS CONCERNED PEOPLE AND CORRUPT OFFICERS WHO ARE HAND IN GLOVE WITH CASAGRAND AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. b) DIRECT THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA TO HAND OVER THE INVESTIGATION TO THE CID AND SET UP A SIT FOR FURTHER INVESTIGATION.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
The office objections remain unattended to despite the peremptory order on 23.10.2024. None appears for the petitioner. This Court must infer lack of interest and hence the petition stands dismissed for default.
SD/(B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE
NV
MR. K. GIRISH KUMAR NAIDU
THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF BBMP
B M SHYAM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
