A writ petition under Article 227 challenging an order in an execution case was withdrawn by the petitioner via memo, and the High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 3020 OF 2024 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI NAVEED AHMED., ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI M. RAMACHANDRA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR CAV/R1)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE/QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 31.10.2023 IN I.A.NO.6 IN EXECUTION CASE.No.808/2017 IN THE FILE OF 14TH ADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE BANGALORE (CCH-28) AT ANNEXURE-A.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo
seeking withdrawal of the petition.
withdrawn .
Sd/JUDGE
VBS
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 43
Smt. P. Manjula
Smt. Jeeva Rani @ Srimati Jeevani
Mrs. Mary Regina Michael
S.R. Krishna Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
