Dismissed

Sri Thimmanna v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC18 Jun 2024WP/2953/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed under Article 226 (coram implies 227 jurisdiction) to quash gazette notification and related orders seeking removal of petitioner's name from RTC extract. Court dismissed petition for non-prosecution due to unaddressed objections after seven listings and lack of representation.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution. No relief granted to petitioner.

Sri Thimmanna Vs the State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:21520 WP No. 2953 of 2023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 18^TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.2953 OF 2023 (LR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI THIMMANNA S/O. LATE ODO ERAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS. R/AT HARTHIKOTE VILLAGE, HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT -577598.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. MURTHY K., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M S BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

¶13

Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: High Court of Karnataka

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA DISTRICT, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501.

¶15

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHITRADURGA CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501.

¶16

THE TAHASILDAR HIRIYUR TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577501.

¶17

…RESPONDENTS

¶18

¶19

NC: 2024:KHC:21520 WP No. 2953 of 2023

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXUREA GAZETTE NOTIFICATION DATED 11.07.2022 BEARING NO. 67 PRJ.2022 PUBLISHED / ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 1; QUASH ANNX-B NOTIFICATION / ORDER DATED 19.07.2022 BEARING LND HYR.CR.NO.(2E)26/2022-23 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER; QUASH ANNEXURE-C OFFICE ORDER BEARING NO.LND.HYR.CR.92/2020-21 DATED 03.08.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 - ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER. QUASH ANNEXURE -C OFFICER ORDER DATED 09.11.2020 IN CASE NO. DCB(REVENUE VILLAGE) CR.NO.18/2020-21 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.4 AND FURTHER ORDER TO CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER AS PER LAW FOR REMOVING THE NAME OF GOVT FROM RTC EXTRACT IN RESPECT OF SCHEDULE LAND AND SET FREE THE PETITIONER FROM ENJOYMENT OF HIS PROPERTY.

¶21

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

¶22

ORDER

¶23

There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.

¶24

Though this petition is listed for 7^th time, office objections have not been removed. This would indicate that, the petitioner is not interested to pursue the writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

¶25

SD/JUDGE

¶26

SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6

Sri Thimmanna v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Thimmanna v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.U.H.Mohammed Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri B Raju Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt Agnes Ozhukayil Vs the State of Karnataka

Ms Diya Devaiah Vs State of Karnataka

Puttaswamy @ Puttaswamygowda Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt Rajamma Vs State of Karnataka