Dismissed

Sapthashri Souharda Credit Co. Operative Society Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC25 Sept 2024WP/2855/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A co-operative society challenged an endorsement of the Mysore Urban Development Authority regarding payment for a site. The petitioner filed a memo seeking withdrawal, stating it had no interest in pursuing the challenge. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn with a direction to refund the amount paid.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sapthashri Souharda Credit Co. Operative Society… — Property and Title | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

NC: 2024:KHC:39890 WP No. 2855 of 2020

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶4

DATED THIS THE 25^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶5

BEFORE

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO.2855 OF 2020 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SAPTHASHRI SOUHARDHA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.7, 3^RD STAGE, DATTAGALLI, MYSORE. REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRI H.A PURUSHOTHAMA, S/O LATE H K ANANDRAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT MYSORE, TALUK AND DISTRICT MYSORE-570 014.

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI ANEPPANAVAR RAMESH BASETTEPPA, ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by NANDINI R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-570 001.

¶14

THE MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, JHANSI RANI LAKSHMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570 005.

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:39890 WP No. 2855 of 2020

¶17

THE MEMBER (PLANNING), MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSHMIBAI ROAD, MYSORE-570 005.

¶18

…RESPONDENTS

¶19

(BY SMT. SPOORTHI.V, HCGP;

¶20

SRI T.P VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 &R-3; SMT. SUMANGALA A.SWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR PSD R-4 ON IA 1/24 SRI MADHUKAR DESHPANDE, ADV., FOR PSD R5)

¶21

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 02.12.2019 PASSED BY THE R-2 MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, MYSORE IN NO. MYN.PRA/VK-2/07/2019-20 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-Q.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶23

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶24

ORAL ORDER

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner as filed a memo

¶26

stating that the endorsement dated 02.12.2019 as per Annexure-Q is questioned. It is submitted that the petitioner having no interest to question the said endorsement issued by respondent No.2. Hence, the petitioner may be directed to withdraw the petition with a direction to respondent No.2 to refund the amount paid by the petitioner towards site No.CA07.

¶27

NC: 2024:KHC:39890 WP No. 2855 of 2020

¶28

¶29

Memo is taken on record.

¶30

Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as

¶31

withdrawn .

¶32

Respondent No.2 is directed to refund the

¶33

amount in accordance with the rule within one month from

¶34

the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶35

In view of withdrawal of the petition, I.A.Nos.1

¶36

and 2 of 2024 do not survive for consideration and are disposed of.

¶37

SD/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶38

PB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 41

Sapthashri Souharda Credit Co. Operative Society Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sapthashri Souharda Credit Co. Operative Society Limited v. the State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. U. C. Siddalingeshwara Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Saraswathamma Vs Sri S M Kumar

Smt Hanumakka Vs Sri Narayanappa

Sri S B Siddaraju Vs the Panchayath Development Officer

Smt Hussain Bi Vs Mohammed Dasthagir

Sri.S.Hoovegowda @ Puttaswamy Gowda Vs Sri.S.Bhyregowda