The petitioner filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking to restrain respondent authorities from taking action on scheduled properties without a hearing. The petition was dismissed by the High Court as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 26110 OF 2022 (BDA)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SMT. KRISHIKA VAISHNAVI, ADVCATE FOR SRI. A MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.YOGESH D.NAIK, AGA FOR R1; K.KRISHNA, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN RESPONDENT NOs.1 AND 2 FROM TAKING ANY ACTION OR PASSING ANY ORDER PERTAINING TO THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES WITHOUT PROVIDING A REASONABLE
NC: 2024:KHC:40930 WP No. 26110 of 2022
OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
ORAL ORDER
petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous and a memo is filed in this regard.
2. Memo is placed on record.
become infructuous.
Sd/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Syed Mustafa S/o Syed Riyaz
State of Karnataka Urban Development Authority
Bengalore Development Authority
M.I. Arun
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
