Petitioners sought a direction to the respondent bank to accept terms of a one time settlement offer letter. Counsel filed a memo seeking withdrawal and the petition was disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 25722 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
BOTH ARE R/AT NO.183, 18TH "B" MAIN ROAD, HAL 2ND "A" STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 008.
…PETITIONERS
Digitally signed by NAGAVENI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
(BY SRI. VINOD S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
CANARA BANK, PREVIOUSLY SYNDICATE BANK, K.R. PURAM BRANCH, THIMMAPPA COMPLEX, OLD MADRAS ROAD, K.R. PURAM, BENGALURU - 560 036. BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. VIGNESH SHETTY., ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
NC: 2024:KHC:14865 WP No. 25722 of 2023
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT BANK TO ACCEPT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ONE TIME SETTLEMENT OFFER LETTER DATED 26/02/2021 GIVEN BY THEM VIDE ANNEXURE - A11 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners files a memo seeking to withdraw the petition.
In terms of memo, the petition is disposed as withdrawn.
Sd/JUDGE
SJK
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 98
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jayalakshmi @ Jayalakshmamma
V. Sushma
Canara Bank, previously Syndicate Bank, K.R. Puram Branch, Bengaluru
M.Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
