A writ petition challenging dismissal orders and seeking reinstatement was dismissed for default as neither the petitioner nor the contesting respondent appeared on consecutive hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:20784 WP No. 25715 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 25715 OF 2015 (S-DIS)
BETWEEN:
S.JOHN AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.8/10, 3RD MAIN, ATHIGUPPE VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 560040
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. B N VENKATESH MURTHY., ADVOCATEABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GOPALA KRISHNA SOODI, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. M.R.C.RAVI, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
NC: 2024:KHC:20784 WP No. 25715 of 2015
THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD 16.01.2015, VIDE ANNEXUREP AND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY DTD27.04.2015 IN ANNEXURE-R AND ALSO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER IN SERVICES OF THE COMPANY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
None appeared for the petitioner or the contesting respondent on the previous hearing date. None appear for these parties even today. Insofar as the petitioner, this Court must opine that he is not interested in prosecuting the petition and hence, the petition stands dismissed for default.
SD/JUDGE
RB
S.John
State of Karnataka by its Chief Secretary
The Hutti Gold Mines Company Limited
B M Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
