Petitioners in unauthorized occupation of land sought a mandamus to consider their regularization representation. The State stated the request had been considered and rejected, rendering the petition infructuous.
None granted; petitioners at liberty to challenge the rejection order before appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF OCTOBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 25560 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed by CHAITHANYA K Location: High Court of Karnataka
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. GIRISH B.BALADARE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HARISH A.S., AGA)
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12.09.2024 GIVEN TO THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, RAMANAGARA SUBDIVISION, RAMANAGARA AND TAHASLIDAR, CHANNATAPATTANA TALUK, CHANNAPATTANA AS PER ANNEXUREs-H AND J AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
NC: 2024:KHC:42410 WP No. 25560 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
the ground that they are in unauthorized occupation and cultivation of the lands which are the subject matter of the writ petition and that they have made an application for regularization of the same. As the same has not been considered so far, they have prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the authorities concerned to consider their representation.
NC: 2024:KHC:42410 WP No. 25560 of 2024
petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed by the authorities concerned, they are always at liberty to challenge the same in the manner known to law.
SD/(M.I.ARUN) JUDGE
PGG
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the authorities were bound to consider the petitioners' representation seeking regularization of their unauthorized occupation and cultivation of land.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
CHANDRASHEKAR P.
MANJU S.
LINGARAJU C.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA DISTRICT
M.I.ARUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
