Dismissed

Shivananda B Hunasyal v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC5 Sept 2024WP/24483/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Assistant Lineman challenged his termination from MESCOM in a writ petition; counsel sought liberty to withdraw to pursue the statutory appeal remedy, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn with a direction that any appeal be decided within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petition withdrawn; liberty to pursue appeal remedy; appellate authority directed to dispose of any appeal within three months.

Shivananda B Hunasyal Vs State of Karnataka — Service and Employment | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:37592 WP No. 24483 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 5^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 24483 OF 2024 (S-DIS)

¶6

BETWEEN:

¶7

SHIVANANDA B HUNASYAL, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, ASST. LINEMAN, MESCOM, VANDSE SECTION, KUNDAPUR DIVISION, TALLUR SUB DIVISION - 576 201.

¶8

…PETITIONER

¶9

(BY SRI RAVINDRANATH K, ADVOCATE)

¶10

AND:

¶11

Digitally signed by MARKONAHALLI RAMU PRIYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

STATE OF KARNATAKA, ENERGY DEPARTMENT, VIKAS SOUDHA, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.

¶13

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, IST FLOOR, MESCOM BHAVAN, CORPORATE OFFICE, KAVOOR CROSS ROAD, BEJAI, MANGALURU - 575 004.

¶14

THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE), MESCOM, O AND M KUNDAPURA,

¶15

2 - NC: 2024:KHC:37592 WP No. 24483 of 2024

KUNDAPURA,

UDUPI - 576 201.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI PRINCE ISAC, AGA FOR R1)

¶20

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORD FROM THE R-3 AND ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI ORDER QUASHING THE ILLEGAL TERMINATION ORDER IN NO.KANIENG(VI)/LEA/SALEA/KIAASA/24-25/5448/55 DTD. 31.08.2024 PASSED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNX-N TO THE WRIT PETITION. AFTER SETTING ASIDE THE TERMINATION ORDER IN NO.KANIENG(VI)/LEA/SALEA/KIAASA/24-25/5448/55 DTD. 31.08.2024 PASSED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNX-N DIRECT THE R-3 TO REINSTATE THE PETITIONER WITH HIS ORIGINAL POST AND ALL TERMINAL BENEFITS AND ETC.

¶21

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMNARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ

¶22

ORAL ORDER

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the petition at length, sought liberty to withdraw this writ petition to avail the appeal remedy provided in law.

¶24

In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶25

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:37592 WP No. 24483 of 2024

¶26

If an appeal is filed by the petitioner before the appropriate authority, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and disposed off at the earliest, which at any rate, shall not be more than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶27

Sd/(R. NATARAJ) JUDGE

¶28

THM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18

Shivananda B Hunasyal v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivananda B Hunasyal v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri P Nagarajan Vs Union of India

Sri. Sunil Pattennavar Vs the Managing Director

Multi Pearl Apartment Owners Association Vs Sri Dwarakanath G

Mr Sanjeevaiah H Vs the State of Karnataka

Shri. Rajesh. D Vs State of Karnataka

Shri T R Manjunath, Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (Bbmp)