Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal's refusal to grant interim relief. The Court held that the case is at an interlocutory stage and such interference under Article 226 is not justified.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:36022-DB WP No. 24146 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA WRIT PETITION NO. 24146 OF 2024 (S-KSAT)
BETWEEN:
DR. B V VASANTH KUMAR AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O LATE B. VEERABHADRAPPA PRINCIPAL (INCHARGE) MAHARANI ARTS COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, MYSURU - 570005 RESIDING AT NO.03, KHB COLONY, HOOTAGALLI , MYSORE, KARNATAKA-570018.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. R.SUBRAMANYA, ADVOCATE A/W SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by NANDINI D Location: High Court of Karnataka
AND:
TANTRIKA SHIKSHANA BHAVANA, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. VIKAS ROJIPURA, AGA R1 TO R4, SRI. PRITHVEESH M.K., ADV. A/W SMT. RAMYA S.L, ADVOCATE FOR R5.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.08.2024 PASSED BY THE LEARNED KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL IN A.No-4165/2024 (PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A) IN SO FAR AS REJECTING THE INTERIM RELIEF SOUGHT BY THE PETITIONER AND CONSEQUENTLY GRANT INTERIM RELIEF AS PRAYED FOR BY THE PETITIONER IN A.No-4165/2024.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA
NC: 2024:KHC:36022-DB WP No. 24146 of 2024
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN)
Heard both sides.
Constitution of India exercising the power of the judicial review, at this stage of the proceedings may not be justified.
of the parties shall be considered on merits by the Tribunal and the expression of opinion, if any, is the order declining interim relief shall not stand in the way of such proper consideration on merits. We are confident that necessary
steps shall be taken by the Tribunal for expeditious disposal of the matter without undue delay. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of .
Sd/(ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE
Sd/(G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 60
1 issue framed by the court
Whether High Court can interfere with the Tribunal's decline of interim relief at the interlocutory stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. B V Vasantha Kumar
State of Karnataka
Commissioner Department of Collegiate and Technical Education
Chief Administrative Officer
Regional Joint Director Department of Collegiate Education
Sri. Basavaraju H. M.
Anu Sivaraman
G Basavaraja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
