Allowed

Smt. Dhanalakshmi T S v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC4 Sept 2024WP/23696/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, the High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2023 regarding the mutation of her agricultural land. The Court relied on the grant order of 1998 and manual RT C records. The petition was allowed. The authority is directed to reflect the entries existing till 2001-02.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner is directed to consider the representation dated 24.09.2023 as per Annexure-E in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within two months.

Smt. Dhanalakshmi T S Vs State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

¶2

NC: 2024:KHC:36206 WP No. 23696 of 2024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.23696 OF 2024 (KLR-RR/SUR)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SMT.DHANALAKSHMI T S W/O UMESH H R AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS AGRICULTURIST GUDDADABEERANAHALLI VILLAGE LAKKAVALLI HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALKURU PIN CODE - 577228

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.H MALATESH, ADVOCATE)

¶11

Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 02

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKAMALURU DISTRICT CHIKMAGALURU - 577101

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:36206 WP No. 23696 of 2024

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT PIN CODE - 577228

¶18

THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT PIN CODE - 577228

¶19

…RESPONDENTS

¶20

(BY SRI.HARISHA A.S., AGA)

¶21

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 AND THE CONCERNED REVENUE AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS REPRESENTATION DTD 24.09.2023 PRODUCED AS ANNX-E AND ETC.

¶22

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶23

ORAL ORDER

¶24

Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 4.

¶25

The petitioner was granted the petition land vide

¶26

grant order dated 14.04.1998. Pursuant to grant, the petitioner's name was duly mutated to the RTC. However,

¶27

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:36206 WP No. 23696 of 2024

¶28

the manual entries were discontinued and are not carried forward to the computerized records maintained by the revenue authorities. This compelled the petitioner to submit a representation requesting the respondent authorities to reflect the entries as they existed in manual RTC.

¶29

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents-State.

¶30

The petitioner, on account of conscious laxness on the part of respondents, has submitted the representation on 24.09.2023 vide Annexure-E. There is conscious laxness on the part of respondents in not considering the representation. If the grant made in favour of the petitioner was intact and the grantee's name was

¶31

mutated and reflected in the ownership column till 2001-02, the petitioner has a legal right to seek a direction at the hands of this Court. Correspondingly, respondent No.4 is obligated to consider representation and pass appropriate orders.

¶32

¶33

NC: 2024:KHC:36206 WP No. 23696 of 2024

¶34

There being a conscious laxness on the part of

¶35

respondent No.4, this Court passes the following:

¶36

ORDER

¶37

i. The writ petition is allowed.

¶38

ii. Respondent No.4 is hereby directed to consider the representation dated 24.09.2023 as per Annexure-E in accordance with law by taking cognizance of the grant order and the existing entries till 2001-02 in the manual RTC and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶39

iii. This exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶40

iv. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.

¶41

SD/(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

¶42

NBM

¶43

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27

Smt. Dhanalakshmi T S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Dhanalakshmi T S v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A Manjunath Vs the Deputy Commissioner

Smt. Marakka Vs the State Government

Sri H R Suryanarayan Vs State of Karnataka

Sri Mohan Kumar G Vs State of Karnataka

Sri G K Anand Kumar Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Ranganatha C Vs State of Karnataka