Allowed

Sri Chandrashekhar v. State of Karnataka

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2024WP/23677/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought direction to respondent Tahasildar to consider a representation dated 28.08.2023 regarding mutation of grant land from manual to computerized revenue records. The Court quashed the inaction due to conscious laxness and directed consideration.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.4 directed to consider the representation dated 28.08.2023 regarding mutation of land records and pass appropriate orders within two months.

Sri Chandrashekhar Vs State of Karnataka — Land Acquisition | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:35525 WP No. 23677 of 2024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.23677 OF 2024 (KLR-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI.CHANDRASHEKHAR S/O LATE MALLAYA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS AGRICULTURIST H.THIMMAPURA VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT PIN - 577228

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI.H MALATESH, ADVOCATE)

¶11

Digitally signed by CHAITHRA A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶12

AND:

¶13

STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-02

¶14

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKMAGALURU-577101

¶15

¶16

NC: 2024:KHC:35525 WP No. 23677 of 2024

¶17

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT

¶18

PIN - 577228

¶19

THE TAHASILDAR TARIKERE TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT PIN - 577228

¶20

…RESPONDENTS

¶21

(BY SMT.B.P.RADHA, AGA)

¶22

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-4 AND THE CONCERNED REVENUE AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE PETITIONERS' REPRESENTATION DATED 28.08.2023 PRODUCED AS ANNX-D AND ETC.

¶23

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶24

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM

¶25

ORAL ORDER

¶26

Learned AGA accepts notice for respondents No.1

¶27

to 4.

¶28

The petitioner was granted the petition land vide

¶29

grant order dated 13.04.1998. Pursuant to grant, the

¶30

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:35525 WP No. 23677 of 2024

¶31

petitioner's name was duly mutated to the RTC. However, the manual entries were discontinued and are not carried forward to the computerized records maintained by the revenue authorities. This compelled the petitioner to submit a representation requesting the respondent authorities to reflect the entries as they existed in manual RTC.

¶32

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA for the respondents-State.

¶33

The petitioner, on account of conscious laxness on the part of respondents, has submitted the

¶34

representation on 28.08.2023 vide Annexure-D. There is conscious laxness on the part of respondents in not considering the representation. If the grant made in favour of the petitioner was intact and the grantee's name was mutated and reflected in the ownership column till 2001-02, the petitioner has a legal right to seek a direction at the hands of this Court. Correspondingly,

¶35

¶36

NC: 2024:KHC:35525 WP No. 23677 of 2024

¶37

respondent No.4 is obligated to consider representation

¶38

and pass appropriate orders.

¶39

There being a conscious laxness on the part of respondent No.4, this Court passes the following:

¶40

ORDER

¶41

i. The writ petition is allowed.

¶42

ii. Respondent No.4 is hereby directed to consider the representation dated 28.08.2023 as per Annexure-D in accordance with law by taking cognizance of the grant order and the existing entries till 2001-02 in the manual RTC and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶43

iii. This exercise shall be completed within a period of two months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

¶44

iv. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off.

¶45

SD/(SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE

¶46

NBM

¶47

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35

Sri Chandrashekhar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Chandrashekhar v. State of Karnataka

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Chowdamma Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri. Doddegowda Vs the State of Karnataka

Sri Adhinarayan Reddy Vs Department of Revenue

Sri Y R Chandrashekar Vs State of Karnataka

Smt Shivarudramma Vs the State of Karnataka

Smt. Anupama Vs State of Karnataka