Petitioner filed a writ petition to quash an E-auction notice regarding his property. Counsel withdrew the petition due to lack of received bids. Court dismissed the petition with liberty to challenge proceedings elsewhere.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge proceedings before the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT PETITION NO. 23109 OF 2024 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
… PETITIONER
(BY SRI. SAMPATH BAPAT., ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
… RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE E-AUCTION NOTICE DTD. 01.08.2024 IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO SI NO.9 SY.NO. 60/2 MEASURING 2 ACRES PUBLISHED IN TIMES OF INDIA VIDE ANNEXURE-D AS ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the petition stating that the E-auction of the petitioner's property was conducted but no bids were received.
Sd/(HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR) JUDGE
VP
2 provisions across 1 enactments
SRI GOUTAM MALOO
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THE REGIONAL COMMISISONER REVENUE DEPARTMENT BANGALORE DIVISION
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
