Dismissed

Sri Kantharaju v. the Chief Executive Officer

Karnataka HC2 Sept 2024WP/23051/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge bench of the Karnataka High Court allowed the withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash a notice that barred a petitioner from operating a pork meat stall. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to apply for a trade license renewal.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to apply for renewal of trade license; Respondent No.4 directed to consider such application.

Sri Kantharaju Vs the Chief Executive Officer — Public Procurement and Tenders | Karnataka HC (2024)

¶1

1 - NC: 2024:KHC:36136 WP No. 23051 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

¶3

DATED THIS THE 2^ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024

¶4

BEFORE

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 23051 OF 2022 (LB-RES)

¶7

BETWEEN:

¶8

SRI KANTHARAJU S/O NANJUNDE GOWDA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT SOREKAYIPURA VILLAGE HIRISAVE HOBLI, DEVALAPURA HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK

¶9

…PETITIONER

¶10

(BY SRI. SURENDRA KUMAR N., ADVOCATE)

¶11

AND:

¶12

Digitally signed by R DEEPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

¶13

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN 573101

¶14

THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT, CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN DISTRICT

¶15

THE TAHASILDAR CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN DISTRICT

¶16

THE PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER MOTHIGHATTA PANCHAYAT MOTHIGHATTA HIRISAVE HOBLI

¶17

¶18

NC: 2024:KHC:36136 WP No. 23051 of 2022

¶19

CHANNARAYAPATNA HASSAN DISTRICT 573124

¶20

SRI. SANTHOSH S.C S/O CHIKKATHIMME GOWDA 34 YEARS, R/AT SOREKAYIPURA VILLAGE SABBANAHALLI POST HIRISAVE HOBLI CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT 573124

¶21

…RESPONDENTS

¶22

(BY SRI. M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2 & R4 SRI. B. BOPANNA, AGA FOR R3 SRI. J.R. THIPPESWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR R5)

¶23

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE VIDE NO. GRAPAN/MATHIGHATTA/2022-23 DATED 07.11.2022 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-H AND THEREBY CONTINUE THE PETITIONER TO RUN PORK MEAT STALL IN SURVEY NO 61/1 OF SOREKAYIPURA VILLAGE, HIRISAVE HOBLI, CHANNARATAPATNA TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF/S.

¶24

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

¶25

CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI

¶26

ORAL ORDER

¶27

After hearing for some time, learned counsel for the

¶28

petitioner seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file the application for renewal of trade license.

¶29

3 - NC: 2024:KHC:36136 WP No. 23051 of 2022

¶30

Submission is placed on record.

¶31

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

¶32

withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If such an application is made by the petitioner, respondent No.4 is directed to consider the application for renewal of trade license and pass appropriate order in accordance with law.

¶33

In view of disposal of the petition,

¶34

I.A.No.1/2024 does not survive for consideration and accordingly disposed of.

¶35

Sd/(ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE

¶36

SKS

Sri Kantharaju v. the Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri Kantharaju v. the Chief Executive Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sri. Y Shanmuga, Vs Kumari Poornima K

Sri. Raghu Nandan. N Vs the State of Karnataka

Hmt Limited Vs Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike

K Srinivas Vs Regional Commissioner and Revision Authority

M/S Dev Publicity Vs the Chief Commissioner

Smt Gulabi Vs Sri Loku Shetty