Petitioner sought to quash an endorsement by the Sub-Registrar demanding an 11E sketch in connection with registration proceedings. Counsel filed a memo seeking leave to withdraw; the court recorded it and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 23050 OF 2021 (GM-ST/RN)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI ABHISHEK M R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed by VALLI MARIMUTHU Location: High Court of Karnataka
OOTY ROAD, NEAR HULLAHALLI CIRCLE, NANJANGUD TALUK - 571301, MYSURU DISTRICT.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.H.RAGHAVENDRA, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 29.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE R-3 SEEKING FOR 11E SKETCH (ANNEXURE-F) AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo seeking
leave of the court to withdraw the petition.
Sd/(K V ARAVIND) JUDGE
CR
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivalinga D
The State of Karnataka, Department of Stamps and Registration
The Inspector General, Registration and Commissioner of Stamps
The Sub-Registrar, Nanjangud
K V Aravind
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
