Writ petition against rejection of production of documents in O.S.No.9084/2006; counsel submitted the suit was settled between the parties, rendering the petition infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 22664 OF 2021 (GM-CPC)
BETWEEN:
Digitally signed BANGALORE 560 001. by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (BY SRI. BHAT GANAPATHY VAJRALLI., ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONERS
AND:
NC: 2024:KHC:34854 WP No. 22664 of 2021
VILAS EXTENSION BANGALORE 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 26.11.2021 IN SO FAR AS REJECTION OF PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ALONG WITH IA NO.4 IN O.S.NO.9084/2006, ON THE FILE OF X ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE (CCH-26) VIDE ANNX-H CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE IA NO.4 MAY BE ALLOWED.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
NC: 2024:KHC:34854 WP No. 22664 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the original suit from out of which the present writ petition arises viz., O.S.No.9084/2006 has been settled between the parties on 04.03.2022 and therefore, the prayer made in the petition has become infructuous .
petitioners is placed on record.
in view of the above.
Sd/(R DEVDAS) JUDGE
DL
List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SMT SUNITHA SHARMA
MS. SUSHEELA SHARMA
SMT PUSHPA D GANGALANI
MR NARESH D GANGALANI
MR. VINOD D GANGALANI
R DEVDAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
