This writ petition sought to quash a notice issued by the BWSSB Executive Engineer. The Court held the issue was covered by a prior judgment and disposed of the present petition on the same terms.
The petition was disposed of on the same terms as WP No. 9633/2023, where the impugned order was quashed and respondents were directed to issue a fresh notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NC: 2024:KHC:3793 WP No. 2226 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 2226 OF 2024 (GM-BWSSB)
BETWEEN : MR. V. SHIVAMANJU, S/O V. VENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, PROPRIETOR M/S MANJUNATHA ENTERPRISES, OFFICE AT 174/17/1, N.T.R. LAYOUT, BEHIND CHOWDESHWARI TEMPLE, MARATHAHALLI , MARATHAHALLI COLONY, BENGALURU – 560 037. (REG. UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT NO.29HELPS 6310LJZW)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVINDRA B S., ADVOCATE)
AND :
Digitally signed by PADMAVATHI B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
…RESPONDENTS
NC: 2024:KHC:3793 WP No. 2226 of 2024
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXUREH THE NOTICE BEARING NO.BWSSB/EE (WWM-STP-H AND AV) PB/501/2023-24 DATED 01.01.2024 VIDE ANNX-H, PASSED BY THE R-3 I.E EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, BWSSB, OFFICE OF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (WWM-STP-HEBBAL AND ARKAVATHI VALLEY) BANGALORE AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
submit that the issue in the lis stands covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in the case of MR. V.SHIVAMANJU Vs.
NC: 2024:KHC:3793 WP No. 2226 of 2024
THE CHAIRMAN, BWSSB AND OTHERS1 , this Court has passed
the following order:
II. The respondents are at liberty to issue notice to the petitioner and the petitioner shall reply in the event such notice is issued, within the time stipulated in the notice. The respondents shall there on pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
III. It is made clear that the petition is entertained only qua the maintenance contract that was awarded to the petitioner and nothing else.."
rendered by this Court and the facts being undisputed, the
petition stands disposed on the same terms.
Sd/JUDGE
AHB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 71
1 W.P.No.9633/2023 disposed on 12.12.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for quashing the notice can be disposed of on the same terms as the earlier judgment in WP No. 9633/2023.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
MR. V. SHIVAMANJU VS. THE CHAIRMAN, BWSSB AND OTHERSReferred¶27
MR. V. SHIVAMANJU VS. THE CHAIRMAN, BWSSB AND OTHERS
Mr. V. Shivamaju
The Chairman, BWSSB
The Chief Engineer, WWM West
The Executive Engineer, BWSSB
M. Nagaprasanna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
M. Nagaprasanna
Parties & counsel
